I am going to make a bold, wild prediction. After a couple of more election cycles (I would not be surprised if in four years, as things are moving fast these days, but more likely in eight or twelve), we will still have a two-party system. And one of those parties will still be the Democrats. But…
November 2012
2 posts
By David Roher
In case you haven’t been hanging around the benighted corners of the political internet lately, there’s an idiotic backlash afoot against Nate Silver, the proprietor of the FiveThirtyEight blog who made his name as one of the sharpest baseball analysts around.
With the election just a few days away, analysis based on state poll aggregation—Silver’s included—suggests that Barack Obama is a heavy favorite against Mitt Romney. The president holds a slight but strong lead in key electoral states. This doesn’t sit well with many political pundits, who insist that the outcome is anyone’s guess and headed down to the wire. Many of these people have directed their anger toward Silver, whose New York Times-hosted blog has predicted a strong probability of an Obama victory since June. They insist he is biased or sloppy in his methodology, even though they seem unaware of how he makes his predictions and of statistical analysis in general. They say—and I’m not kidding—he’s too gay for this sort of work.
In retrospect, we should’ve seen it coming. It was only a matter of time before the war on expertise spilled over into the cells of Nate Silver’s spreadsheets. In fact, in some ways it had already. Turns out that nothing could have prepared Silver better for the slings and arrows of a surly and willfully obtuse pundit class than working on the fringes of sportswriting over the past decade.
October 2012
2 posts
Does everyone remember the famous letter from Caltech chemist Erick Carreira to his unruly, unmotivated, and apparently unprincipled laboratory assistant? Or subsequent discussion about the compulsory workaholic culture of academic chemistry which followed the letter’s publication in 2010?
…
September 2012
7 posts
Children and teenagers should be active for around sixty minutes a day.That’s vigorous activity, as in running, swimming, cycling, playing a sport, or other strenuous physical play.
Spotted the problem yet? If you’re a parent with children who lives in a city, what do you tell them? That’s right - be quiet, sit still, don’t run. In almost all spaces in the city, children cannot play, or, in academese, “engage in vigorous activity”, without disturbing the adults who go about their daily business. The floors of flats are not adequately sound proofed, so kids can’t dance, run, or jump indoors without inconveniencing the neighbours downstairs. There are some public gardens and paths, but unless there are dedicated play parks, the space needs to be shared with cyclists and dogs and their owners (or it is prohibited to step onto the grass).
While children at least have play parks, teenagers have school sports and organised sports; older teenagers may be able to join a gym on their parents’ dime. That’s (mostly) it.
“The environment has been shown to have the strongest influence on children’s objectively measured activity”, say Mark Hamer and Abigail fisher in their recent editorial on the effectiveness of interventions on child activity levels. No shit, sherlock.
“You’re not that religious, aren’t you?” asked a friend recently.
This friend is an atheist who regularly makes fun of religious dogma online. I’ve noticed that quite a few vocal atheists are preoccupied with dogma. Dogma is the perfect target for atheists - sometimes deeply irrational, sometimes profoundly at odds with the moral judgement of others. “Look at the horrors of dogma” is the ultimate killer argument. It doesn’t matter what people actually do, believe, and practice, because there will always be people who live by the dogma that is being torn to shreds - when in doubt, cite appropriate religious groups from the United States, Iran, or Israel.
So you have a choir of strong atheist and humanist voices speaking out against their favourite hateful dogma and shouting at BBC Saturday Morning Live. Sometimes, atheists go one step further and postulate that people from a religious group who don’t adhere to certain practices or dogmas don’t count. It doesn’t matter how people identify themselves, it matters how others would like to categorise them. To make measurement easier, group membership is binary. You conform to the external criteria of choice and you’re in, you don’t conform, and you’re out.
Christians who take a strong historical-critical view of the Bible don’t count, because it’s more convenient to see Christianity as a religion that is ruled by a Holy Book which contains the old favourite Leviticus. It’s not convenient to acknowledge that Christianity is extremely diverse, and that different denominations treat the Bible differently. Atheism, despite much handwringing by vocal online atheists, is quite possibly even more diverse. There is no such thing as The Christian Voice™, and no such thing as The Atheist Voice™. There are just different pools of babble.
Christians who refuse to conform to the stereotypes, who don’t shout about their beliefs, who respect other traditions of belief and non-belief, and who do not engage in anti-secularist propaganda, exist. Atheists and humanists who choose not to shout about their particular lack of belief, who refuse to be snide and condescending about religious people, and who respect other traditions of belief and non-belief exist, too. And we coexist in peace.
For the record, I am deeply religious.
Power Clean +193 pts
- 20 kg x 5 reps (+34 pts)
- 25 kg x 2 reps (+25 pts)
- 27.5 kg x 2 reps (+26 pts)
- 30 kg x 2 reps (+27 pts)
- 30 kg x 2 reps (+27 pts)
- 30 kg x 2 reps (+27 pts)
- 30 kg x 2 reps (+27 pts)
Barbell Bench Press +379 pts
- 20 kg x 12 reps (+56 pts)
- 25 kg x 5 reps (+50 pts)
- 30 kg x 3 reps (+43 pts)
- 35 kg x 3 reps (+46 pts)
- 35 kg x 3 reps (+46 pts)
- 35 kg x 3 reps (+46 pts)
- 35 kg x 3 reps (+46 pts)
- 35 kg x 3 reps (+46 pts)
Standing Barbell Shoulder Press (OHP) +588 pts
- 30 kg x 2 reps (+50 pts)
- 20 kg x 5 reps (+64 pts)
- 25 kg x 2 reps (+46 pts)
- 27.5 kg x 5 reps (+71 pts)
- 25 kg x 3 reps (+55 pts)
- 25 kg x 2 reps (+46 pts)
- 20 kg x 5 reps (+64 pts)
- 20 kg x 5 reps (+64 pts)
- 20 kg x 5 reps (+64 pts)
- 20 kg x 5 reps (+64 pts)
Think you can beat me, or want to comment?
![]()
Barbell Squat +1026 pts
- 20 kg x 10 reps (+54 pts)
- 25 kg x 5 reps (+50 pts)
- 30 kg x 3 reps (+43 pts)
- 35 kg x 2 reps (+39 pts)
- 40 kg x 2 reps (+42 pts)
- 40 kg x 2 reps (+42 pts)
- 40 kg x 2 reps (+42 pts)
- 40 kg x 2 reps (+42 pts)
- 40 kg x 2 reps (+42 pts)
- 40 kg x 2 reps (+42 pts)
- 40 kg x 2 reps (+42 pts)
- 40 kg x 2 reps (+42 pts)
- 40 kg x 2 reps (+42 pts)
- 40 kg x 2 reps (+42 pts)
- 40 kg x 2 reps (+42 pts)
- 40 kg x 2 reps (+42 pts)
- 40 kg x 2 reps (+42 pts)
- 40 kg x 2 reps (+42 pts)
- 40 kg x 2 reps (+42 pts)
- 40 kg x 2 reps (+42 pts)
- 40 kg x 2 reps (+42 pts)
- 40 kg x 2 reps (+42 pts)
- 40 kg x 2 reps (+42 pts)
- 40 kg x 2 reps (+42 pts)
Power Clean +90 pts
- 25 kg x 3 reps (+30 pts)
- 25 kg x 3 reps (+30 pts)
- 25 kg x 3 reps (+30 pts)
Hang Clean +31 pts
- 20 kg x 4 reps (+31 pts)
One-Arm Dumbbell Row +195 pts
- 8 kg x 6 reps (+39 pts)
- 8 kg x 6 reps (+39 pts)
- 8 kg x 6 reps (+39 pts)
- 8 kg x 6 reps (+39 pts)
- 8 kg x 6 reps (+39 pts)
Think you can beat me, or want to comment?
![]()
Please read this if you think verbal assault is harmless. Or if you think it’s OK to badger a woman who wants to be left alone.
And then I debated whether or not to put it on Tumblr…but I decided it was important. Because in my own way, I can (unfortunately) point out exactly what is wrong with men when they don’t realize how hard it is to be a woman. How we do not have equal opportunities and freedoms in everyday life….
August 2012
3 posts
A map of American state stereotypes, generated by Google autocomplete.
In the months before a US Presidential election, the quality of political discourse hits new lows. Blue State/Red State tropes dominate the news cycle as the media gins up outrage over perceived injustices in the culture…
July 2012
2 posts
Barbell Deadlift +570 pts
- 40 kg x 5 reps (+62 pts)
- 45 kg x 5 reps (+67 pts)
- 50 kg x 5 reps (+72 pts)
- 50 kg x 5 reps (+72 pts)
- 50 kg x 5 reps (+72 pts)
- 50 kg x 5 reps (+72 pts)
- 50 kg x 5 reps (+72 pts)
- 45 kg x 12 reps (+81 pts)
Two-Arm Kettlebell Swing +108 pts
- 8 kg x 15 reps (+36 pts)
- 8 kg x 15 reps (+36 pts)
- 8 kg x 15 reps (+36 pts)
Bent Over Barbell Row +130 pts
- 20 kg x 5 reps (+26 pts)
- 20 kg x 5 reps (+26 pts)
- 20 kg x 5 reps (+26 pts)
- 20 kg x 5 reps (+26 pts)
- 20 kg x 5 reps (+26 pts)
One-Arm Dumbbell Row +142 pts
- 8 kg x 20 reps (+48 pts)
- 6 kg x 20 reps (+47 pts)
- 6 kg x 20 reps (+47 pts)
Think you can beat me, or want to comment?
![]()
Fitocracy has helped hundreds of thousands of people reach the next level of fitness. Sign Up free.
Barbell Deadlift +62 pts
- 40 kg x 5 reps (+62 pts)
Think you can beat me, or want to comment?
![]()
Fitocracy has helped hundreds of thousands of people reach the next level of fitness. Sign Up free.
June 2012
4 posts
After a couple of weeks on my new routine, I’m very happy with its flexibility. I’ve taken the routine from Jim Wendler’s 5/3/1, Second Edition; it involves two compound lifts each session, which appeals to me a lot.
The routine takes about an hour, and I really benefit (mentally and physically) from spending four sessions a week in the gym. Without my amazing husband, Thomas Bender, and his kidwrangling skills, this wouldn’t be possible, by the way, because I’m now training at two (gasp) different gyms.
Friday: upper body. Compound lifts: press 5/3/1, close grip bench for assistance. This is followed by superset biceps and triceps curls, dumbbell rows, and chins with assistance. The curls are with 10kg, rows with 12 kg, and chins with 45 to 50kg assistance, depending on whether they are last in the day or a little earlier. All assistance work is for three sets of ten reps.
After some refueling, I dance my little butt off at Zumba for 45 minutes. (Shut up. It’s fun.)
Saturday or Sunday: lower body. Compound lifts: Deadlift 5/3/1, low back squat as assistance, Power Clean 5/3/1, superset sit ups and planks (3 reps, 15 sit ups / 30” planks).
Monday: upper body. Compound lifts: bench, incline bench. Assistance as Friday.
Tuesday: lower body. Compound lifts: Low back squat 5/3/1, stiff legged deadlift as assistance, Power Clean 5/3/1, Assistance as Saturday.
On the “upper body” days, I train at Virgin Active Fountainpark, because they have a Junior 10kg bar. This is ideal for getting my upper body lifts up.
On the “lower body” days, I’m going to train at the Edinburgh University Gym at the Pleasance. It’s a fantastic gym, used by the athletes that go to the university. (Alumni include Sir Chris Hoy). It’s got proper bars, multiple power racks and olympic platforms, and TWO rooms FULL of free weights. Doing deadlifts and power cleans with proper bumper plates makes all the difference to my form.
For what it’s worth, I’m now about to start the third week of my current cycle, where the weights go up to their maximum. For the press, I am aiming for 25kg x 6, for the bench, 37.5kg x 3, for the squat, 37.5kg x 6, and for the deadlift, at 45kg x 12. My Power Clean stands at a maximum of 30 kg for reps, which is good, because I usually clean my presses. (I don’t want to put too much pressure on the lone, but much loved squat rack at Fountainpark.) I usually warm up with five minutes on the elliptical.
(Keen interpreters of these numbers will note that my squat is indeed higher than my bench, but I’m working with a similar max because after a truly amazing training session with Mark Rippetoe, I reset yet again, hopefully this time with proper form.
Tip for modern adulterers: If you’re planning to cheat on your wife of 10 years by awkwardly hitting on the model seated next to you on your flight out of Los Angeles, make sure she isn’t live-tweeting the entire miserable experience to her 13,000 followers;
I plan to read at least 20 of the following books:
- Dan Brodsky-Chenfeld, Above all odds. Autobiography of a champion skydiver.
- chris McDougall, Born to run. Another inspirational sports story.
- Armando Iannucci, The audacity of hype. Should be fun, had it for a while now
- Mary Beard, Parthenon. The first of four of women writing about history
- Bettany Hughes, The Hemlock Cup. It’s about Socrates. Nuff said.
- Bettany Hughes, Helen of Troy. Homer, battles, romance.
- Lucy Worsley, Courtiers. A look at the early days of the people who are now the Windsors and the people around them
- Sabine Werz, Sex and Crime auf Königsthronen. Promises to be a racy read.
- Gelber, The dragon and the foreign devils. China’s foreign policy from 1100BC to the present day. Continues the history theme
- mark Kurlansky, A Basque history of the world. The Basques are a fascinating people, and Kurlansky is a great writer.
- Christopher Hitchens, Arguably. One to dip in and out of. The first in a line of choices that pay homage to the skeptic originators of the Readathon
- James Randi, The Faith Healers. Classic debunking.
- Bering, Jesse. The God Instinct. About the psychological basis of belief.
- Bruce Hood, Supersense.
- ML White, Scripting Jesus. Critical biblical scholarship.
- Ronald J Frederick, Living like you mean it. The title sounds like a horrible self-help book, but it appears to be based on sound therapeutic principles.
- Chip and Dan Heath, Switch. What does it take to change?
- Gary Taubes, The diet delusion. I am trying to switch to a diet higher in protein and lower in sweets. Motivation, motivation, motivation
- Caitlin Moran, How to be a woman. It will be interesting to read her take on feminism.
- Hitchings, Henry. The Language wars. Paying tribute to my linguist leanings.
- Gilliver, Peter. The ring of words. How Tolkien influenced the Oxford English Dictionary.
- Jan Morris, Venice. Finishing the list with travelogues / cultural portraits
- Barbara Demick, Nothing to envy. I find North Korea fascinating. This looked promising and was on sale.
- mountains of the mind, a fantastic book about mountaineering
May 2012
14 posts
Although I’ve had a lot of fun running Mark Rippetoe’s Starting Strength routine, I’ve only managed to stick to it for two months before Life intervened - my mother-in-law died, work mounted up, and my chronic low mood decided to stop by and say hello.
One of the best ways of lifting my mood is weightlifting, so I looked for a routine that
- gets me in and out of the gym in 90 minutes
- allows me to lift more than three times a week
- makes me stronger (speed of strength acquisition is not an issue)
After some experimenting, it looks like a variation of Jim Wendler’s 5/3/1 routine might fit the bill. In 5/3/1, you work up to one main work set of the day. This means that you need less rest inbetween sets. The work set gets progressively heavier for three weeks, followed by a deload. Weights are increased every four weeks. For each work out, you focus on one main lift, followed by assistance exercises.
I am going to try the Simplest Strength programme in the second edition, using the following pattern:
- Monday: Press (main lift), close grip bench press (full-body assistance lift), dumbbell rows, biceps curls, triceps pushdowns, assisted chin-ups
- Tuesday: Deadlift (main), squat, leg press, sit-ups, planks, lunges, power cleans
- Thursday: Bench Press (main), incline bench press, dumbbell rows, biceps curls, triceps pushdowns, assisted chin-ups
- Friday: Squat (main), stiff-legged deadlift, leg press, sit-ups, planks, lunges, power cleans
The assistance exercises are limited to those I have done in the past and know how to do. The main and full-body assistance lifts will be programmed according to the specification on pages 55-56 of the Second Edition of 5/3/1, the other assistance exercises will be done for 3x10, and superset if possible.
Astute readers of my Twitter timeline may recall that I asked a while ago whether they ever needed their ESTA number. I hadn’t received an email confirmation of my ESTA approval, and couldn’t call up my application number, but when trying to fill in another ESTA, my application showed up as approved. Although this made me a little nervous, I thought I would be fine.
As it turns out, I was right to be nervous. When I arrived at Edinburgh airport on Friday May 4 to print off my boarding passes, the airline employee waved me over. “When were you last in the US? I see here that you don’t have an ESTA.” My heart sank.
I was escorted to the business class check in, where another employee searched high and low for my permission to travel, but she couldn’t find it. After conferring with another employee, she told me that they were able to override the system if I could give them my application number. But I didn’t have my application number.
My next stop was the Servisair counter. Again, no luck. I repaired to a bench in the hall, where I got online and checked the status of my application. My application was shown as approved, but I could not retrieve a number. We phoned the ESTA service agent, whose telephone number I had found on the US Embassy web site. We immediately reached a human, who assured me that my ESTA had been granted. All of a sudden, I could also see the application number. I settled back down and retrieved a German and an English version, while the airline employee advised me to wait 20 minutes. I whiled away thirty minutes at a nearby cafe, and twenty minutes before boarding was due to start, I asked again.
No joy, still had not percolated into the airline system. Luckily, I remembered the snippet of information I had been given earlier. “You can override this!”, I told the employee. After conferring with his boss, he agreed, but he would have to see my approval. I produced the German version. He shook his head. With what must have been a slightly wild look in my eyes, I produced the English version. I got my boarding passes and reached the gate five minutes before boarding.
As I wouldn’t reach the United States until a full 24 hours after the unsuccessful retrieval, I hoped that the approval would have percolated through the system. Having waited 45 minutes to see an agent (Dallas Fort Worth airport were seriously understaffed), everything seemed to go smoothly - until the agent uttered the dreaded words “You don’t have an ESTA, I see here”. My heart sank again. I offered to produce the evidence on my computer, but I hadn’t counted with the thoroughness of US Immigration (“US Border Control - We Take Immigration Seriously”). No electronics allowed. I was escorted into the Immigration Office behind the row of desks. Fifty minutes later, a federal agent had successfully looked up my number, and I was in the country.
The moral of the story? Put your ESTA number in your passport as a post-it note, so that no electronics will be required to recall it. As long as your application can be retrieved as approved from the main ESTA site, you will be fine, even if the local computer systems say no. Just make sure you’re at the airport on time.
The Geek Manifesto. Sounds like a call to arms, doesn’t it? And indeed it is - geeks are called to action and influence policy. But who are those geeks that Mark Henderson, the author, is talking about? As somebody who self-identifies as a geek, I looked at the trial chapters on Kindle to find out.
The definition of the word itself is hotly contested. The Wikipedia page for the term lists eight definitions, as far as I can see. (I cite Wikipedia instead of a dictionary because such a page is more likely to reflect the meanings that “geeks” themselves assign to the term, and because it is more likely to capture recent shifts in meaning.) Some meanings of the term “geek” are derogatory, implying poor social skills; others celebrate the intensity with which a person devotes themselves to a particular subject. The two definitions with which I am most familiar because of my background in technology and humanities are these two:
Definition 1 (tech geek): A person who is interested in technology, especially computing and new media. Geeks are adept with computers, and use the term hacker in a positive way, though not all are hackers themselves.
and
Definition 2 (geek by immersion): A person with a devotion to something in a way that places him or her outside the mainstream. This could be due to the intensity, depth, or subject of their interest. This definition is very broad but because many of these interests have mainstream endorsement and acceptance, the inclusion of some genres as “geeky” is heavily debated.
Which definition does Henderson use? In his first chapter, he introduces geeks as “[p]eople with a passion for science and the critical thinking on which it is founded” and “those curious kids who always preferred sci-fi to celebrity magazines and chemistry sets to trendy trainers”. (Position 89, Kindle taster edition, ff.) This narrows the meaning of the term down to science geeks who highly value rational, critical thinking.
As the introductory chapter continues, it becomes clear that Henderson uses an even narrower definition than this. The examples he gives for typical geeks are all prominent skeptics (Ben Goldacre, Richard Dawkins, Brian Cox, Simon Singh, Carl Sagan, Michael Shermer, Robin Ince, James Randi). Skeptics in the Pub is highlighted as a place to meet other geeks and discuss science and critical thinking (position 320). The view of science Henderson presents is highly familiar to me from the skeptical literature. In other words: The Geek Manifesto reads like a Skeptic manifesto.
The only time that Henderson deviates from the geeks=skeptics pattern in his introductory chapter is when he mentions Mumsnet (position 359) as an example of geek activism. Presumably, this is in the technology geek sense of the word, even though you don’t have to be a geek to go online in a forum; you just have to be a geek to run it. However, judging from the table of contents, this seems to be the only time he looks at tech geeks (or the science of technology), unless there are discussions of privacy, encryption, or nuclear power in the chapters on the environment and law.
I am not sure to what extent the skeptic community overlaps with those who call themselves science geeks; this would make an interesting study, if it hasn’t been done already. Based on my own experience of both communities (skeptics: outsider; geeks: fringe insider) I would suggest that Skeptics are a (vocal) subgroup of geeks-by-immersion, people who have devoted themselves to science and rational thinking. For me, one of the hallmarks of skeptics is that they are very enthusiastic about extending quantitative scientific methods (however those are defined) to everything that’s not on a tree by the count of three. From what I can see (position 243f. and the “About the Book” page), Henderson follows this tendency in his book. Therefore, the most appropriate definition of geek for the “Geek Manifesto” might even be (with tongue firmly in cheek)
Definition 3 (method geek): A person who relates academic subjects to the real world outside of academic studies; for example, using multivariate calculus to determine how they should correctly optimize the dimensions of a pan to bake a cake. (from Wikipedia page)
Based on this Kindle taster, would I buy the book? One day, I would like to read it as a contemporary document of the time skeptics got political, and in particular of the libel reform movement, which I’ve partly watched unfold on Twitter and blogs.
It’s rather low on my list, however, as I have about 300+ unread books at home. To be honest, I am slightly riled by the way science geeks seem to be reduced to the Skeptic community, as if Skeptics represented the One True Way of rational thought. I am also somewhat nonplussed by what seems to be an absence of tech geek activism. For example, I wonder whether the campaign to save Bletchley Park that people like Sue Black were involved in is mentioned anywhere.
P.S.: If you are unfamiliar with the Skeptic literature, I would highly recommend starting with the books of one of my intellectual heroes, Martin Gardner. I devoured his book on astronomy as a child. There is nobody like him in modern Skepticism. (Sniff.)
P.P.S.: If you are interested in the kinds of books I would push to the top of the unread stack, I have some book purchase logs you may want to look at. I’ve read books by almost all of the Skeptics Henderson mentions as shining example of geekiness, and I’ve thoroughly enjoyed them, as an outsider, looking in.
P.P.P.S.: I would like to thank Gimpy, Dr Aust, and Stephen Curry for taking the time to comment on earlier versions of this post - they helped sharpen the argument. The responsibility for the final version is mine.
Right now, my body greatly displeases me aesthetically - it is all too easy to find faults with the way I look. The only way I can get away from this is to think about my body in terms of what it allows me to do. But yesterday, I found another interesting approach in Tina Fey’s book Bossypants. One of the early chapters of the book looks at her own body image troubles growing up as a short brunette in an age of yellow haired Amazons. At the end of the chapter, she lists all of her perceived shortcomings - how she made her peace with them. Hopefully, I will be able to find the courage to follow her example soon.
I am seeking an agent with a sense of urgency, ambition, and integrity.
Sorry, you lost me at ambition.
Of course, only the best agent will do …
When you’re done, you can also get a Certification in Homeland Security. The Navy has paid more than $8.5 million for sailors to obtain similar credentials.
The Chair of the ACFEI Advisory Board is Cyril Wecht, the famous pathologist and former Allegheny County Coroner.” —http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2012/04/healthcare-update-04-30-2012/
April 2012
5 posts
The three books I’m blogging here all relate to weightlifting - as in picking heavy things up and putting them down again. Weightlifting has been the perfect sport for me:
- I tend to ruminate and worry endlessly. You can’t ruminate with a 40kg barbell on your back, you just go up and down with it. +1 mental health
- Due to my gross motor dyspraxia, I can’t do team sports (because any team I’m on would lose). But I can do solitary sports, such as lifting, and I can focus on the power lifts (squat, bench, deadlift), which don’t require the coordination needed to get the Olympic lifts (snatch, clean and jerk) right. +1 physical health
- Weightlifting builds muscle and makes me stronger; the risk of injury is minimal compared to many other sports. +1 physical health
- Often, when I pass a mirror, I shudder at the sight of what I think is a fat, unsightly stomach. But then I remember that I lift - and I need some reserves for calories that build muscle. +1 mental health
- In order to lift big, you need to eat properly (protein, fruit and veg) and get sufficient rest. +1 each to mental and physical health
Since I’m a voracious reader, I love to read about lifting. I learned pretty quickly that magazines like Men’s Health were not for serious lifters, but for people who want to get abs fast. So I get my reading material from books and internet sources such as Starting Strength, Mark Rippetoe’s amazing site. The books I buy tend to come recommended by lifters and strength coaches I respect.
Marty Gallagher
First up, there’s Marty Gallagher’s book Purposeful Primitive . In the first part of the book, Marty profiles several great lifters and their approach to training, in the second part, he describes his training system. It’s not a book I would recommend for beginners, but it is a good introduction to the sheer variety of approaches to training, and covers conditioning, which tends to get short shrift in the lifting literature.
Easy Strength
Then, we have Easy Strength by Dan John and Pavel. Dan John is a strength coach with a degree in Catholic theology who has worked with high school students and athletes. Dan’s writing is chatty and fluid; I find his work very motivating. He fearlessly experiments with his own training, and shares successes and failures. Pavel is Mr Kettlebell. Although Pavel’s self-marketing can be a bit offputting, there is a lot of substance behind the Evil Russian Strength Master mask. Easy Strength is a book on a no-nonsense approach to strength training which is based on a clear analysis of training goals. More to come as I read it.
5-3-1
Finally, a book that is guiding my current training, Jim Wendler’s 5-3-1 for Strength Training. I have the second edition eBook. 5-3-1 is perfect if you don’t have much time in the gym. If you still need to learn the lifts, this is not for you, but if you mostly need programming advice, this is a real gem. Progression on Wendler’s programme is slower than on others, such as Starting Strength, but the gentle pace can be very useful when you have a lot of other stresses in your life and can’t put in the focus required for a traditional linear progression, where you increase your weights each session.
For Beginners?
All three books are for people who already know a bit about lifting. If you are new to lifting, and would like to get started, the one book I would recommend above all others is Starting Strength by Mark Rippetoe. It is self-published to very high standards, a beautiful book. Buy from Aasgard (i.e. Rippetoe) directly if you can - they are a fantastic small company, very ethical.
(This post continues the book blogging project I started in this post.)
It’s quite clear what the view of Malcolm Bowden is, which is transcribed in full here courtesy of @Gurdur - people only get depression because they are not True Christians (TM).
I would like to contrast Malcolm’s take on the bible with this wonderful passage from S Jocelyn Burnell, which I studied intently during Quaker Meeting today:
Sometimes religion appears to be presented as offering easy cures for pain: have faith and God will mend your hurts; reach out to God and your woundedness will be healed. The Beatitude ‘Blessed are they who mourn, for they shall be comforted’ can be interpreted this way too, but the Latin root of the word ‘comfort’ means ‘with strength’ rather than ‘at ease’. The Beatitude is not promising to take away our pain; indeed the inference is that the pain will remain with us. It does promise that God will cherish us and our wound, and help us draw a blessing from our distressed state.
http://qfp.quakerweb.org.uk/qfp21-66.html
This is what I felt in Meeting - comfort and sustenance.
(edited: changed title because it was inaccurate, as pointed out by @markhawker.)
I followed a link from @Puffles2010 and came across the Fashionworked questionnaire. It seemed like a good place to reflect on my own clothing style as it is now.
Vintage or new?
I don’t care if clothes are vintage or new - they have to fit well, flatter my curves, and be the right size. I buy relatively few clothes, and I tend to be ruthless with weeding out clothes that no longer fit either me or my current style. Since I spend most of my money on books, I like shopping in charity shops, but that’s time consuming, especially with kids in tow.
The styles I like are feminine, but not girlie and not staid, old-fashioned, or middle-aged. I’m very comfortable in casual jeans / trousers and well-fitting T-shirts, but I also have a weakness for elegant, understated business-style clothes. Currently, my wardrobe suffers from too many T-shirts and a distinct lack of dresses and leather-style or jeans jackets (Lack = 0). I would also like to branch out into more quirky clothing, the kind of clothes you would find in shops geared towards students.
Best place to shop?
For everyday wear, Marks and Spencers at the Gyle Centre; I just love the store. For everything else, whichever Edinburgh charity shop I happen to wander through. Places like Primark, French Connection, Harvey Nichols, or indeed Topshop just depress me - they remind me of a phase when I thought fashion was for thin women, not for women like me. Everything that smacks of stylish women’s magazine fashion alienates me a little.
Is fashion a part of our cultural heritage?
Most definitely. I love playing a game called “Spot the German”, where I try to identify people as German tourists based on their dress and hairstyle. The British style is more playful, girlie; women wear more make-up, are more likely to be blonde, and show off their cleavage. Quite bright and assertive!
Fave piece of clothing/footwear you own?
To me, a good bra is indispensable. It gives my saggy postnatal body shape and definition.
Fave fashion quote?
“Fuck calories” - Krista Scott-Dixon
Earlier this year, I vowed not to buy any more books until I had read at least 60 physical and 40 books of my massive unread stash. Books are my great weakness - I comfort buy and borrow them like other people comfort buy food, clothes, or shoes.
And then March happened, and I started comfort buying again. This was made somewhat easier on the purse by my birthday, which is on March 26. When people asked what to get me (OK, when my husband and my parents asked), I just said: “Book vouchers”. And off I went, adding another 27 books to the 16 I had accumulated in my early- to mid March spree.
This is now it - I’ve spent my money for presents, and for the rest of the year, I have an allowance of ten more books.
I take the title of this post from one of the books I purchased, Dan Ariely’s Predictably Irrational. I’d long wanted to read this book after having sampled the introduction on Kindle, and now finally got it.
The remaining 26 acquisitions fall into five main categories: essays / humanities, popular science, history of science, history, and self-help / fitness.
I have a long-standing interest in sociology and philosophy; a third of my PhD thesis was dedicated to the philosophy of communication, and I used to be particularly fascinated by sociologists like Luckmann and Elias. Thanks to my interest in eHealth, I’m now coming back to my “old love”. I’ve ordered Rob Stones’ book on Structuration Theory because I am intrigued by the approach to analysing Health IT systems in the wild that Trisha Greenhalgh and he proposed recently. There’s a fine line between over theorising and over simplifying analyses. Despite the initially daunting terminology, it looks like this approach might strike a good balance.
I’m also interested in theology, in particular liberal theology. This is why I picked up a Kindle copy of Keith Ward’s The Philosopher and the Gospel. It will be interesting to see how Ward integrates historical critical scholarship with his own deep faith.
As a counterpoint, we have Arguably , by the late Christopher Hitchens. I love reading Vanity Fair for their in-depth political reporting (don’t snigger - the US edition has some great stuff!), and that’s where I became fond of Hitchens’ writing. I sometimes disagreed with him, but he always made his point eloquently, and it was a joy to read him.
Four down, twenty-two more to go … see you next time for more “Books Maria Spends Money On”
March 2012
1 post
So, I had this resolution, namely to read 60 hardcover and 40 Kindle books before I bought any new ones.
Unfortunately, life threw me a curveball, and I soothed myself in a very predictable way involving Foyles, amazon.de, the amazon Kindle store (shutupIhadavoucher), Hugendubel, and the local bookstore in Mudersbach, Lesestübchen (ahem).
Let’s survey the damage.
My haul at Foyles:
Mafalda inedita, by Quino - Mafalda is just amazing. A little Argentinian girl tells it like it is. Politics, feminism, being a kid, you name it, Mafalda has it covered. Quino, the author, wrote Mafalda from the mid-Sixties until the mid-Seventies. Like Bill Watterson, he ended the comic when he felt he was about to jump the shark. The result is a modern classic.
The Horse, the Wheel, and Language by David W Anthony is a scholarly detective story of the origins of Indo-European language and culture. I’m about 20% of the way through, and it is an absorbing read.
Flat Earth by Christine Garwood is a fascinating piece of history of popular science. In this book, Garwood argues that the view that the earth is flat emerged relatively recently and superseded earlier knowledge about a round earth. I haven’t read the book yet, but I am looking forward to seeing Garwood trace the history of ideas, and the contortions that were required to implant the Flat Earth idea in people’s minds.
My Kindle collection grew by four works. First up was the eBook of Mark Rippetoe’s Starting Strength, which I also have as a paperback. Since this was mainly for my own reference in the gym, I decided not to count it. If you are interested in picking heavy shit up and putting it back down again, GET THIS BOOK.
Then, there was Gary Taubes’ The Diet Delusion, also known as Good Calories, Bad Calories in the US. When experimenting with my own nutrition, I found that I fare much better on a high protein, low-ish carb diet (40% protein, 30% fat, 30% carb, fact fans). Since I also have diabetes II in the family, I thought I would have a look at Taubes’ arguments, which favour the kind of diet I’ve been moving towards.
Since I am very impressed by the monolingual dictionaries that come with Kindle, I decided getting a foreign language book might be an ideal way to bolster my Spanish and French. The French offerings were a bit dire, but I found a nice history of Spain, Breve historia de Espana, which seems readable and appears to have been written by a competent historian.
Finally, I am fascinated with a particular type of German writer who worked in the early 20th century, wrote prose and journalism, and used a clear, incisive style. One of this group of writers is Stefan Zweig, and I got his Sternstunden der Menschheit for Kindle.
At Hugendubel, a local chain book store, I got Zweig’s Schachnovelle - we were going to read this for a book club which I will probably be unable to attend now.
At the Lesestübchen, I ordered a copy of the most up-to-date Zweig biography, Stefan Zweig - Drei Leben, eine Biografie by Oliver Matuschek. This book covers Zweig’s tumultuous life which spanned the Austrian Empire, the Great War, the Anschluss, and exile. Zweig killed himself before the end of World War II, sending shock waves through the German and Austrian emigrants.
I continued the Zweig theme by ordering Donald Prater’s biography of Zweig (used) via amazon.de. Six further used book purchases ended my shopping spree.
The first book, “Die Schule der Frauen” by the German critic Iris Radisch, was recommended to me by a female physicist who came up against gender discrimination while working in Switzerland. She is now at home with her three children.
Next up was a biography of the writer Thomas Mann, who covers a similar time span as Zweig. The reviews said it was scholarly and thorough, the price was right, so I put in my order.
The next two books focus on cultural history. Frank Stein’s short book highlights the long cultural history of Jews in Germany, a reminder of what was destroyed in the last century, while “Verschwende Deine Jugend” is a novel about the New Wave / punk movement in Germany in the late Seventies / early Eighties. Although I was born in 1974, and so only caught the tail end of the Neue Deutsche Welle, I didn’t particularly like most of the music that was in the charts in my early teens (soft rock, stadium rock), and went through a long phase of listening to early Eighties music.
The final two books are concerned with the history of places. “Deutschland vor Ort” is a collection of stories that capture some of the spirit of Germany, each linked to a place of historical significance, and “Auf Römerstrassen durch Europa” goes back to the time to the Roman Empire, when a large part of the continent was unified under Roman rule. I’ve always been interested in Roman history; I learnt Latin at school, which has stood me in good stead when confronted with Romance languages, and I grew up East of the Rhine, in the part of Germany that the Romans successfully occupied. Many of my favourite childhood trips were to Roman monuments and sites such as the archaeological park at Xanten.
Total haul: 16 books. No more purchases until I’ve read those 16, plus the 60 paper and 40 eBooks I originally planned.
Hopefully.
January 2012
2 posts
I have too many books.
No, really.
The number of physical and virtual books I own is over 1000, many of which are unread - accumulated because I would like to be able to read them one day, and may not be around a library that will stock them.
At least that’s my flimsy excuse.
Before this addiction insanity occasional indulgence can get out of hand, I need A Resolution (TM, 2012). So here it is:
After January 6, when the 12 days of Kindle special offers expire (stop laughing over there in the cheap seats), I will not buy any more books, no matter what format, until I have read 60 of my physical and 40 of my digital books. Books I have started but haven’t finished count, and I will only count books of 100+ pages.
I hope to be finished some time this year.
(I’m not resolving to briefly blog each book I read - now that would be preposterous …)
Awesome. Via Shellebelle’s sea shells.
Neil Gaiman
Crowley and Aziraphale’s New Year’s resolutionsNeil Gaiman and Terry Pratchett present New Year’s resolutions of the demon Crowley and the angelic Aziraphale — characters in their collaborative novel, Good Omens.
Crowley:Resolution #1: I…
August 2011
4 posts
Can you comment now? I think my reply settings were too restrictive …
Behind the Black Door is the story of Sarah Brown’s tumultuous three years in Downing Street. The Kindle trial excerpt ends halfway through Brown’s first week as the Prime Minister’s Wife (WPM).
The book is part of Sarah Brown’s campaign to make Downing Street, and with it politics, more accessible to people. Her strategy is to show the human beings behind the doors, the people who fulfil the functions. This part of the book is extremely predictable - dignified, just the right amount of gossip, a lot of emphasis on serving the United Kingdom, and a glowing portrait of her husband.
What is somewhat less predictable, and what would be my main reason for getting the book out of the library (or picking it up used), is how Brown tackles the ill-defined role of WPM. It is clear from the outset that Brown is a highly intelligent, driven, hard-working woman. Now here she is, having given up a promising career of her own, working out how to fit into an amorphous place where there are no clear rules except one, that she must not become a liability.
It will be interesting to see how Sarah Brown defines the role of a WPM, how she juggles family and work duties, and how she asserts her identity independent, but completely supportive of, Gordon Brown.
I love Amazon’s Kindle samples. They’re an easy way of satisfying my book lust; it’s like endless hours of leisurely browsing in a jam-packed bookstore, but in any place I like, because the samples are on my mobile phone, my iPad, or my iPod Touch.
I’ve decided to share some of my impressions about the samples I read here on Tumblr - both as a way of reminding myself of what I thought about various sample books and as a way of sharing recommendations and views with people.
These won’t be full book reviews - the verdict will be heavily influenced by whether the sample allowed me to get a good idea of the author’s approach and style, of the subject matter and of the adventures that would lie ahead if I had access to the complete text.
May 2011
1 post
… led me to meander through book stores. This invariably led to the purchase of controlled substances made of paper, also called “books”. Nine books, for the equivalent total of £80, four of them stunningly beautiful hardbacks.
Here’s a list:
- Noga Arikha, “Passions and Tempers - A History of the Humours” A book on the history of medical science, more precisely the notion of the humours blood, phlegm, choler, and bile.
- Daniel Boorstin, “Cleopatra’s Nose - Essays on the Unexpected” A playful perspective on key moments in American history
- Portia De Rossi, “Unbearable Lightness - A Story of Loss and Gain” De Rossi chronicles her anorexia and bulimia in the context of her life as an actress, model, overachiever, and secret lesbian.
- Thomas Dormandy, “The Worst of Evils - The Fight Against Pain” Comprehensive history of pain and its management by a retired consultant pathologist. 500+ thoroughly footnoted pages
- Erik Larson, “Thunderstruck” The story of Marconi’s telegraph, and how it helped to catch a murderer
- Michael Pollan, “In Defense of Food - An Eater’s Manifesto” Pollan’s classic treatise on sensible eating
- James Shapiro, “Contested Will - Who Wrote Shakespeare?” A Shakespeare expert investigates why people refuse to believe Shakespeare actually wrote his own plays
- Two presents for my husband
March 2011
8 posts
Chick-a-chick-a-chugga!
As promised, here are the books I cited:
1) “The Holy See had come to view the worldwide church as a nation, with its own Canon Law binding on its citizens - the priests of the church - in whatever country they might be found.”
- Geoffrey Robertson, <a href=”http://www.amazon.co.uk/Case-Pope-Vatican-Accountability-Rights/dp/0241953847/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1300137001&sr=1-1”>The Case of the Pope.</a> A case that deserves to be heard, and is set out eloquently, without the usual indiscriminate Catholic bashing.
2) “How sad my parents thought this top-dollar institution would have any influence on me; the beatings weren’t working as well as my dad expected so he thought some strict, Swiss discipline might do the trick.”
- Ruby Wax, <a href=”http://www.amazon.co.uk/How-Do-You-Want-Me/dp/0091887895/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1300137074&sr=1-1”>How Do You Want Me</a>, featuring Alan Rickman in swimming trunks and mental health.
3) “The academic study of linguistics thrilled me, to be sure, and I reveled in piecing together the multi-dimensional jigsaw puzzle that is the grammar of a language.”
- K. David Harrison, <a href=”http://www.amazon.co.uk/Last-Speakers-Worlds-Endangered-Languages/dp/1426204612/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1300137117&sr=1-1”>The Last Speakers</a>. Because languages are too precious to die.






















